The Hidden Revolution
How Socialist and Communist Ideology Has Infiltrated American Institutions
Credit to Karlyn Borysenko, please check out her work on Substack
https://substack.com/@karlyn?r=4j0fiz&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=profile
America faces an unprecedented internal threat that operates not through violent revolution or foreign invasion, but through the systematic infiltration of our most fundamental institutions using carefully crafted language designed to obscure revolutionary intent. This threat comes from a coordinated network of socialist and communist organizations, activists, and politicians who have successfully embedded their ideology throughout American government, education, media, and civil society while maintaining plausible deniability through linguistic manipulation.
The scope and sophistication of this infiltration has been largely misunderstood by mainstream conservative analysis, which continues to treat these movements as merely misguided liberal activism rather than recognizing them as components of a coherent revolutionary strategy aimed at dismantling the foundational principles of American society. Even the Trump administration and traditional conservative leadership have fundamentally mischaracterized the nature of this threat, focusing on surface-level political disagreements while missing the deeper ideological warfare being waged against capitalism, individual liberty, and constitutional governance.
Dr. Karlyn Borysenko, through thousands of hours of direct observation and documentation within radical leftist organizations, has provided the most accurate analysis of how this revolutionary movement operates. Her work reveals that the American left has developed a sophisticated system of coded language that allows them to communicate revolutionary goals while maintaining public acceptability. This linguistic strategy enables them to advance Marxist objectives under the guise of social justice, equity, and democratic reform.
The evidence demonstrates that this is not a collection of separate progressive movements with different goals, but rather a unified revolutionary project with four core objectives that drive every tactical decision: gaining as much power as possible, destabilizing existing systems, attacking capitalism, and ushering in their Marxist utopia. Understanding this framework is essential for comprehending how seemingly disparate movements from Black Lives Matter to climate activism to educational reform are actually coordinated components of a single revolutionary strategy.
The Revolutionary Dictionary: Decoding the Language of Subversion
The foundation of this infiltration strategy rests on what Borysenko identifies as the left’s creation of an entirely separate dictionary that uses familiar English words but assigns them revolutionary meanings. This linguistic manipulation allows radical organizations to communicate their true intentions to fellow revolutionaries while appearing moderate to uninformed observers. The sophistication of this system cannot be overstated, as it enables the left to operate openly while maintaining plausible deniability about their ultimate objectives.
When socialists speak of capitalism, they are not referring merely to an economic system of free markets and entrepreneurship. In their revolutionary dictionary, capitalism specifically means private property ownership in all its forms, including individual home ownership, land ownership, rental properties, parental rights over children, and individual liberties. This comprehensive definition explains why socialist organizations consistently attack what most Americans consider fundamental rights rather than limiting their focus to corporate regulation or wealth inequality.
The term socialism itself serves as an umbrella concept encompassing anyone seeking to abolish capitalism as they define it. While technical distinctions exist between various leftist ideologies, in practice these groups use socialist, communist, and Marxist terminology interchangeably when communicating among themselves. Their shared commitment to abolishing private property ownership unifies otherwise diverse organizations under a common revolutionary banner.
Equity represents perhaps the most dangerous example of linguistic manipulation, as this term has gained widespread acceptance in corporate, educational, and governmental contexts while carrying explicitly Marxist meanings. Equity in socialist terminology refers to equality of outcomes achieved through systematic discrimination against successful individuals and groups. This concept fundamentally contradicts American principles of equal opportunity and meritocracy, instead demanding equal results regardless of individual effort, talent, or choices. The implementation of equity requires the abolition of individual achievement and private property accumulation, as these create unequal outcomes that equity ideology cannot tolerate.
Democracy in the revolutionary lexicon does not mean representative government with constitutional protections for minority rights. Instead, it refers specifically to socialism, based on the premise that only a society built on equity can achieve true democracy. This explains why socialist organizations consistently advocate for abolishing the Electoral College, Senate, and Supreme Court, as these institutions protect constitutional governance against direct majoritarian control.
The manipulation of racial terminology represents another crucial component of the linguistic strategy. When contemporary leftist organizations discuss whiteness, white supremacy, or systemic racism, they are using coded language to refer to capitalism itself. This connection operates on the theoretical foundation that capitalism created and maintains racial disparities, therefore abolishing racism requires abolishing capitalism. Anti-racism thus becomes a revolutionary project aimed at dismantling private property ownership rather than a civil rights movement seeking equal treatment under law.
Decolonization provides the activist framework for implementing this anti-capitalist agenda. In revolutionary terminology, colonization refers to the process of taking something under collective control and privatizing it under capitalism. Decolonization therefore means removing capitalist structures and returning systems to collective ownership. This explains why decolonization movements target everything from university curricula to housing policy to family structures, as all of these are viewed as sites of capitalist colonization requiring revolutionary transformation.
The attack on gender and family structures operates through similar linguistic manipulation. Queer theory, as implemented in contemporary activist movements, is not primarily about sexual orientation or gender identity but rather represents a far-left political ideology specifically designed to abolish the gender binary as an attack on capitalism. Socialist theory identifies the nuclear family as the primary mechanism through which capitalism reproduces itself across generations, making family disruption essential to revolutionary success. Gender ideology serves as the delivery mechanism for introducing these concepts to children, normalizing the idea that traditional family structures represent oppressive systems requiring dismantlement.
Institutional Infiltration: The Scope of Revolutionary Penetration
The extent to which revolutionary ideology has penetrated American institutions demonstrates the sophistication and coordination of this infiltration campaign. Rather than operating as isolated activist groups, these organizations have systematically targeted key institutional choke points that allow them to influence policy, shape public opinion, and recruit new adherents to their cause.
Educational institutions from elementary schools through universities have become primary vehicles for revolutionary indoctrination. The implementation of decolonization curricula explicitly challenges traditional academic standards and American historical narratives while promoting anti-capitalist ideology under the guise of diversity and inclusion. Universities have institutionalized programs that teach students to view standard American English as a tool of oppression, traditional academic achievement as manifestation of white supremacy, and private property ownership as systemic racism.
These educational initiatives are not spontaneous developments but rather coordinated implementations of revolutionary theory. The systematic introduction of gender ideology in elementary schools, critical race theory in secondary education, and decolonization programs in higher education follows a deliberate strategy to shape generational attitudes toward fundamental American principles. Students are taught to view capitalism, individualism, and constitutional governance as systems of oppression rather than foundations of freedom and prosperity.
Government institutions at federal, state, and local levels have similarly been infiltrated through the placement of individuals trained in revolutionary ideology into key bureaucratic positions. The implementation of equity initiatives throughout federal agencies represents the institutionalization of Marxist principles within the administrative state. These programs systematically discriminate against qualified candidates based on demographic characteristics while promoting revolutionary activists into positions of influence and authority.
The penetration extends beyond formal government structures into the broader network of non-governmental organizations that shape policy and public opinion. Organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America maintain members in Congress who advocate for abolishing fundamental American institutions including the Senate and Electoral College while promoting social ownership of production through public enterprises and decentralized planning.
Corporate institutions have proven surprisingly receptive to revolutionary infiltration through diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that embed anti-capitalist ideology within business operations. The irony of capitalist enterprises promoting anti-capitalist ideology demonstrates the effectiveness of the linguistic manipulation strategy, as corporate leaders implement revolutionary programs while believing they are supporting moderate social justice initiatives.
Media institutions, both traditional and social, have been systematically captured by individuals committed to revolutionary ideology who use their platforms to normalize anti-American concepts while marginalizing traditional perspectives. The consistent framing of American institutions as inherently racist, the promotion of equity over equality, and the systematic suppression of conservative viewpoints reflects coordinated ideological commitment rather than journalistic independence.
Law enforcement and judicial institutions face systematic attack through the revolutionary framework that views police as managers of private property and courts as enforcers of capitalist oppression. The movement to defund police, eliminate cash bail, decriminalize theft, and fundamentally transform criminal justice operates from the theoretical foundation that law enforcement exists primarily to protect private property ownership against collective appropriation.
Religious institutions have not been immune to this infiltration, with many denominations embracing liberation theology and social justice frameworks that prioritize revolutionary activism over traditional spiritual concerns. The systematic reinterpretation of religious teachings to support anti-capitalist ideology demonstrates how revolutionary movements exploit even spiritual institutions to advance their political objectives.
The Leadership Structure: Identifying the Real Revolutionary Network
Understanding the true leadership structure of the American revolutionary movement requires looking beyond the political figures promoted by mainstream media to examine the ideological architects and organizational strategists who actually drive revolutionary strategy. The conventional focus on politicians like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Bernie Sanders, while not irrelevant, misses the deeper network of trained Marxists who provide intellectual leadership and tactical coordination for the broader movement.
The Black Lives Matter organization provides a crucial case study in revolutionary leadership structure. Co-founders Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza explicitly identified themselves as trained Marxists with extensive background in revolutionary theory and practice. Their approach to racial issues operates from the fundamental premise that racism cannot be addressed without abolishing capitalism, making their organization inherently revolutionary rather than reformist. The strategic decision to focus on police violence rather than economic issues reflects sophisticated understanding of how to build popular support for anti-capitalist objectives without explicitly advocating for revolutionary transformation.
Academic institutions harbor some of the most influential revolutionary leaders, including figures like Ibram X. Kendi who has successfully mainstreamed explicitly anti-capitalist ideology through the framework of anti-racism. Kendi’s theoretical contributions establish the intellectual foundation for viewing capitalism and racism as inseparable systems, providing ideological justification for revolutionary transformation. His influence extends far beyond academic circles, as his concepts shape corporate training programs, government policies, and educational curricula throughout American institutions.
The Democratic Socialists of America represents the most significant organizational vehicle for revolutionary activism within mainstream American politics. With over ninety thousand members and elected representatives in Congress, DSA operates as a coordinated network advancing systematic challenges to American constitutional governance. Their platform explicitly calls for social ownership of production, abolition of the Senate and Electoral College, and establishment of working-class democracy to replace existing governmental structures.
Labor organizations have been systematically captured by revolutionary activists who use union structures to advance anti-capitalist objectives beyond traditional workplace concerns. The integration of racial justice, climate activism, and gender ideology into labor organizing reflects the revolutionary understanding that all forms of oppression stem from capitalist exploitation and therefore require comprehensive systemic transformation rather than narrow economic reforms.
Environmental organizations operate from revolutionary frameworks that explicitly connect climate activism to anti-capitalist ideology. The systematic framing of environmental issues as consequences of colonialism and capitalism provides justification for revolutionary transformation of economic and political systems. Climate justice organizations explicitly state that meaningful environmental protection requires dismantling capitalist structures and implementing collective ownership of resources.
Religious leadership within progressive denominations has been systematically influenced by liberation theology that prioritizes revolutionary activism over traditional spiritual concerns. The reframing of religious teachings to support anti-capitalist ideology demonstrates how revolutionary movements penetrate even spiritual institutions to advance their political objectives.
Technology and media leadership increasingly reflects revolutionary ideological commitments, with platforms consistently suppressing conservative viewpoints while amplifying anti-American narratives. The systematic censorship of information that challenges revolutionary premises, combined with algorithmic promotion of anti-capitalist content, demonstrates coordinated ideological commitment rather than neutral platform management.
Youth organizations and campus activism provide crucial recruitment and training mechanisms for developing future revolutionary leadership. The systematic indoctrination of students in anti-American ideology creates a pipeline of committed activists who will occupy positions of influence throughout American institutions in coming decades.
The Coordinated Attack on American Foundations
The revolutionary strategy targeting American institutions operates through coordinated attacks on the foundational principles that sustain constitutional governance, free-market economics, and individual liberty. These attacks are not random or opportunistic but rather reflect systematic implementation of revolutionary theory designed to destabilize existing systems while building alternative structures aligned with Marxist objectives.
The constitutional system faces systematic assault through efforts to abolish institutions that protect minority rights and limit majoritarian power. Revolutionary organizations explicitly advocate for eliminating the Electoral College, Senate, and Supreme Court as undemocratic institutions that prevent implementation of their equity agenda. The framing of constitutional protections as tools of oppression rather than safeguards of liberty demonstrates the fundamental incompatibility between revolutionary ideology and American governance principles.
Private property ownership encounters systematic challenge through the expansion of government authority over individual economic decisions. Revolutionary activists promote policies that restrict property rights, limit inheritance, expand eminent domain authority, and systematically transfer private assets to collective control. The consistent framing of property ownership as theft and exploitation provides ideological justification for these confiscatory policies.
Educational systems face comprehensive transformation designed to indoctrinate students in anti-American ideology while eliminating traditional academic standards. The systematic implementation of critical race theory, gender ideology, and decolonization curricula reflects coordinated efforts to shape generational attitudes toward fundamental American principles. Students are taught to view constitutional governance, free markets, and individual achievement as systems of oppression requiring revolutionary transformation.
Family structures encounter systematic attack through policies and cultural messaging designed to transfer child-rearing authority from parents to collective institutions. Revolutionary theory identifies the nuclear family as the primary mechanism through which capitalism reproduces itself, making family disruption essential to revolutionary success. The promotion of alternative family structures, expansion of state authority over parenting decisions, and systematic undermining of parental rights reflect this strategic imperative.
Religious liberty faces systematic assault through efforts to force compliance with revolutionary ideology while restricting traditional religious expression. The consistent framing of traditional religious beliefs as hate speech and discrimination provides justification for restricting religious freedom in favor of revolutionary objectives. Faith-based institutions encounter systematic pressure to abandon traditional teachings in favor of progressive ideology.
Economic freedom encounters systematic restriction through expansion of government control over private enterprise, implementation of wealth redistribution programs, and regulatory policies designed to limit individual economic opportunity. The consistent framing of economic inequality as systemic injustice provides justification for confiscatory taxation, business regulation, and wealth transfer programs that fundamentally alter the relationship between individual effort and economic reward.
Cultural institutions face systematic capture through the placement of revolutionary activists in positions of influence within entertainment, sports, arts, and media organizations. The consistent promotion of anti-American narratives, systematic suppression of traditional viewpoints, and coordinated messaging campaigns reflect ideological commitment rather than organic cultural evolution.
The Threat to American Survival
The scope and sophistication of revolutionary infiltration into American institutions represents an existential threat to the survival of constitutional governance, individual liberty, and free-market economics. This threat operates not through violent revolution but through the systematic transformation of institutional cultures, policy frameworks, and generational attitudes toward fundamental American principles.
The revolutionary movement has successfully normalized concepts that were previously considered radical fringe positions, including the abolition of private property, systematic racial discrimination through equity programs, elimination of constitutional protections for minority rights, and comprehensive government control over individual economic decisions. The mainstreaming of these revolutionary concepts demonstrates the effectiveness of the linguistic manipulation strategy in advancing anti-American objectives while maintaining public acceptability.
Educational institutions now systematically indoctrinate students in anti-American ideology while presenting this indoctrination as academic rigor and social justice education. The capture of educational systems ensures that future generations of Americans will enter adulthood with fundamentally different attitudes toward constitutional governance, individual rights, and economic freedom than previous generations. This represents a form of generational warfare designed to achieve through demographic transition what could not be accomplished through immediate political transformation.
Government institutions increasingly implement policies based on revolutionary ideology rather than constitutional principles or democratic accountability. The systematic implementation of equity programs throughout federal agencies represents the institutionalization of Marxist principles within the administrative state. These programs systematically discriminate against qualified Americans while promoting revolutionary activists into positions of authority and influence.
Economic institutions face systematic pressure to implement anti-capitalist policies through diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that embed revolutionary ideology within business operations. The corporate adoption of revolutionary concepts demonstrates how linguistic manipulation enables the infiltration of even supposedly capitalist enterprises with anti-capitalist ideology.
Cultural institutions consistently promote anti-American narratives while suppressing traditional viewpoints, creating an information environment that systematically distorts public understanding of American history, institutions, and principles. The capture of cultural institutions enables revolutionary movements to shape public opinion while marginalizing alternative perspectives.
The cumulative effect of these systematic infiltrations represents a fundamental transformation of American society away from constitutional governance and individual liberty toward collective control and revolutionary transformation. The sophistication and coordination of these efforts demonstrates that this represents a conscious strategic campaign rather than organic social evolution or democratic political competition.
Conclusion
The evidence demonstrates that America faces a coordinated revolutionary movement that has successfully infiltrated our most fundamental institutions while maintaining plausible deniability through sophisticated linguistic manipulation. This movement operates not as a collection of separate progressive organizations but as a unified strategic campaign aimed at dismantling the foundational principles of American society and replacing them with Marxist alternatives.
The traditional conservative response of treating these movements as misguided liberal activism fundamentally misunderstands the nature of the threat. Revolutionary organizations explicitly state their objectives of abolishing capitalism, dismantling constitutional governance, and implementing systematic discrimination through equity programs. Their success in normalizing previously radical concepts demonstrates the effectiveness of their strategic approach and the inadequacy of conventional political responses.
The scope of institutional infiltration reveals that this threat cannot be addressed through normal political competition or policy debates. Revolutionary movements have systematically captured educational, governmental, corporate, media, and cultural institutions while training new generations of activists committed to anti-American ideology. The depth of this infiltration requires comprehensive recognition of the threat and systematic efforts to restore American principles throughout captured institutions.
Dr. Karlyn Borysenko’s analysis provides essential tools for understanding how revolutionary movements operate and communicate, enabling Americans to recognize the true nature of contemporary political conflicts. Her documentation of the linguistic manipulation strategies used by revolutionary organizations exposes how they maintain public acceptability while advancing anti-American objectives.
The survival of American constitutional governance, individual liberty, and economic freedom depends on recognizing the scope and sophistication of the revolutionary threat we face. This recognition must lead to systematic efforts to expose revolutionary infiltration, restore American principles within captured institutions, and prevent further revolutionary advancement through institutional capture.
The time for treating socialist and communist infiltration as a peripheral concern has passed. The evidence demonstrates that revolutionary ideology has penetrated the core institutions that sustain American society and represents an existential threat to the survival of constitutional governance. Only through comprehensive recognition of this threat and systematic efforts to counter revolutionary infiltration can America preserve the foundational principles that have sustained our republic for over two centuries.